3DNews Vendor Reference English Resource -
All you need to know about your products!
Biostar And ECS CPU Boundedness Foxconn 9800GTX
About Us | Advertise  
Digital-Daily.com
Digital-Daily

Motherboard
CPU & Memory
Video
Mobile
Cooling
Editorial
Digital
Links

Google
Web
www.digital-daily.com
www.3dnews.ru








Digital-Daily : Cooling : coolers_p4_heatpipes

Comparison of coolers using heatpipes

Author: Aleksandr Mitrofanov
Date: 28.12.2003

Testing

Testing was performed on Abit IC7-G ; motherboard, Motherboard Monitor was used as a monitoring tool. Intel Pentium4 2.4 processor with D1 stepping, working on 3.0GHz on nominal voltage.

Also all coolers were tested in more difficult conditions: the processor was working on 3.6GHz at Vcore=1.65V.


Heating of the processors was made by two running copies of BurnP6. Two working applications allow to load a processor at full capacity (I should remind that D1 stepping processors support HyperThreading).

Then the tested system has been assembled in Inwin S506 case and power supply has been placed outside the case. The matter is that this power supply has a fan with adjustable rotation speed (dependent on temperature) and such power supply could influence testing results. If a cooler has its own thermal interface, this thermal interface has been removed and further measures were carried out with KPT-8 silicon-organic thermal paste.

Here goes the effectiveness of Pentium4 3.0GHz cooling.


The system was working steadily with all types of coolers. Zalman 7000 cooler and Themalright heatsink + Zalman ZM-F2 fan have shown particularly good results. Water cooling system conceded them only 4 C degrees. The most probable reason is poor effectiveness of aluminum waterblock.

As to Auras coolers, their effectiveness can be ranged as average (close to Tt Spark5 cooler or Tt Spark7). The reason is relatively weak fan, which is installed on CoolEngine-T6C and -T6C Golden models.

Then we increase voltage up to 1.65V and increase FSB frequency up to 300MHz. Now Pentium4 processors is working on 3.6GHz and is emitting at least 100-110W of heat.


The first testing was performed with Auras CoolEngine-T6C cooler. The temperature reached the value of 71C quite fast and the system shut down a minute after that. That is why I decided not to test knowingly weak CoolEngine-T6C-Golden. Zalman 7000C was the next: the system was working with him for 10 minutes with a processor temperature of 70C and then it restarted.

Anyway this result didn't surprise me; I was performing such tests before. The next one was Poseidon which was keeping processor temperature at 70C for two hours. The system was stable through all this time, but I cannot guarantee that the stability was achieved due to the Pentium4 internal overheat protection. I must remind that as soon as overheating occurs, Pentium4 is starting to "omit clock cycles" that leads to significant decrease of total performance but prevents further increase of temperature. And this "critical threshold" is different for different types of processors. That is for example for processors working on 3.0GHz at Vcore = 1.525V, the performance decreases when 77-80C temperature is reached (it was figured out in the last comparison testing of Pentium4 coolers).

And finally I installed Thermalright SP-94 heatsink with Zalman ZM-F2 fan. The result has outperformed all my expectations: the processor temperature did not exceed 67 degrees.

It is natural if a reader would ask the question: is the effectiveness of SP-94 heatsink worse or better than the one of "ordinary" liquid cooling systems, which have both brass heatsink and wateerblock? One more water inexpensive (worth ~$100) cooling system took part in our testing which has shown the result of 62.5C (we will review it later in our upcoming publications). It is obvious that more expensive and systems will demonstrate better results, but the fact is: Thermalright SP-94 prolongs life of "air" cooling systems. Actually this is achieved with hard labor, that is one has to give $50-55 for a heatsink besides some $ for a good (!) fan.

Surely this review will be interesting mostly for overclockers, which choose a cooling system for the future Prescott processors. Ordinary users should not worry about anything. When these processors are issued, Intel will either overcome technical difficulties of increased heat emission or will design an effective "box" cooler.

If we make first brief conclusions, they would be the following. I can recommend only Thermalright SP-94 and Zalman 7000-Cu or -AlCu for purchasing. Concerning Poseidon system, it can be bought for not more than $30. Concerning Poseidon system, in spite of their "technological" look, their effectiveness is far from being optimal and it is difficult to recommend it for purchasing. However I haven't found prices of -T6C(Golden) in the net, and if it fits reasonable limits (say $15) these coolers will find their customer for system of "average performance".

Conclusion

Thermalright SP-94 heatsink

Pros:

  • Extreme performance
  • Compatibility with 80mm and 92mm fans
Cons:
  • Difficult installation + absence of a manual for inexperienced users.
  • High price

Auras CoolEngine-T6C cooler

Pros:

  • Easily installable
Cons:
  • Average level of performance
  • High level of noise.


Auras CoolEngine-T6C-Golden cooler

Pros:

  • Very easily installable
  • Beautiful appearance
Cons:
  • Low level of performance
  • High level of noise.

Poseidon WCL-02 liquid cooling system

Pros:

  • Good performance for Intel processors
  • Low level of noise
Cons:
  • High price;
  • Aluminum heatsink and waterblock;
  • Low performance for AMD Athlon processors.

Zalman 7000 Cu and AlCu coolers

Pros:

  • Installed/removed easily;
  • Variable rotation speed;
  • Excellent noise/performance ratio.
Cons:
  • Rotation speed regulator is located inside the case
  • High price

Appendix

Intel Pentium4: Northwood D1 (800MHz FSB) ; stress-testing
Intel Pentium4: Northwood C1 (533MHz FSB) ; stress-testing

Please leave your questions, wishes and offers in this forum.

Content:

  • Thermalright SP-94
  • Auras CoolEngine-T6C (Golden)
  • Poseidon WCL-02 (or Iceberg 1)
  • Performance and conclusions




  • Top Stories:
    MoBo:


    ECS X58B-A (Intel X58)
    ASUS Rampage II Extreme (Intel X58)
    MSI DKA790GX and ECS A780GM-A Ultra
    MSI P7NGM (NVIDIA GeForce 9300)
    Intel X58 and ASUS P6T Deluxe
    MSI P45 Neo2 (Intel P45)
    Foxconn A7GMX-K (AMD 780G)
    VGA Card:


    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 – a new leader in 3D graphics!
    ECS HYDRA GeForce 9800GTX+. Water-cooled and SLI "all-in-one"
    Radeon HD 4830 CrossFire - better than Radeon HD 4870!
    XFX GeForce GTX 260 Black Edition in the SLI mode
    Leadtek WinFast PX9500 GT DDR2 – better than GeForce 9500GT DDR-3
    Palit Radeon HD 4870 Sonic: exclusive, with unusual features
    Palit HD 4850 Sonic: almost Radeon HD 4870, priced as HD 4850
    CPU & Memory:

    GSkill high-capacity memory modules
    CPU Intel Core i7-920 (Bloomfield)
    DDR3 memory: late 2008
    CPU AMD Phenom X3 8750 (Toliman)
    AMD Phenom X4 9850 – a top-end CPU at affordable price
    CPU Intel Atom 230 (Diamondville)
    Chaintech Apogee GT DDR3 1600


      Management by AK
      Design VisualPharm.com

    Copyright © 2002-2010 3DNews.Ru All Rights Reserved.
    contact - info@digital-daily.com
    Digital-Daily - English-language version of the popular Russian web-project 3DNews