3DNews Vendor Reference English Resource -
All you need to know about your products!
Biostar And ECS CPU Boundedness Foxconn 9800GTX
About Us | Advertise  
Digital-Daily.com
Digital-Daily

Motherboard
CPU & Memory
Video
Mobile
Cooling
Editorial
Digital
Links

Google
Web
www.digital-daily.com
www.3dnews.ru








Digital-Daily : Motherboard Reviews : abit_in9_32x_max

abit IN9 32X-MAX (NVIDIA nForce 680i SLI)

abit IN9 32X-MAX (NVIDIA nForce 680i SLI)
Author: Aleksandr Mitrofanov
Date: 29.10.2007

Performance

Note that abit IN9 32X-MAX sets the nominal FSB speed to some overstatement:

During the performance tests, we compared abit IN9 32X-MAX versus ECS PN2 SLI2+ (nForce 680i SLI) and ASUS Striker built on the same chipset.

In our test setup, we used the following hardware:


Test setup
CPU Intel Core 2 Duo E6700 Socket LGA775 2.66 GHz (Conroe core, stepping B1)
Cooler Zalman 7700Cu
Video Card MSI NX7900 GT (GeForce 7900GT; PCI Express x16)
Driver version: 93.71 WHQL
Sound card Creative Live 5.1
HDD Samsung HD160JJ
Memory 2x512 MB Corsair DDR2 TWIN2X1024-8000UL1
Power supply unit FSP 500W
OS Windows XP SP1

Let's first take a look at the results of synthetic benchmarks.

Now on to the gaming benchmarks (i.e. real-world applications).

Final Words

This motherboard left some dubious impressions. On the one hand, there was nothing to complain about the technical part: the board was running stably, fully revealing its capabilities of the NVIDIA nForce 680i SLI chipset and offers powerful onboard expansion options (plus a Wi-Fi expansion card).

On the other hand, the produce of abit has always been perceived by users as solutions for overclockers. But at the overclocking part, IN9 32X-MAX is too weak - the maximum FSB speed = 375 MHz and does not allow squeezing the most of the CPU. So let's hope the problem is rooted in the current BIOS version and the situation with overclocking will be fixed in forthcoming versions.

However, if we look through the reviews of previous abit boards, we can see that they offer a lower overclocking capability than, for example, ASUS boards (abit used to be on par with ASUS, but surpassed it at overclocking).

As regards the retail price, on the moment of tests the IN9 32X-MAX was offered only by one company at $290, which seems a bit too high in our view. On the other hand, abit is expanding the user's choice which before the release of this board was about the various versions of ASUS Striker and numerous clones of motherboards based on NVIDIA's reference design.

In the end, we'll make the final conclusions regarding abit IN9 32X-MAX in the end of the year, in a large roundup review for motherboards aimed at Core processors.

Conclusion

Pros:
  • Excellent stability and performance;
  • Support for SLI (two PCI Express x16 slots);
  • Third PCI Express x16 slot (8 bus lanes);
  • Support for SerialATA II (8 links; 2x RAID);
  • Support for ParallelATA (1 link);
  • Two Gigabit LAN controllers and integrated 8-channel High Definition Audio;
  • Support for USB2.0 (10 ports) and Firewire (2 ports);
  • Additional uGuru chip + utilities (FanEQ, BIOS profiles, OC Guru, etc.);
  • The most advanced system monitoring and support for the uGuru Panel;
  • 7-stage POST indicator;
  • Passive/active* system for cooling the chipset and the power supply module;
  • Optional WiFi expansion card.
Cons:
  • Flaws in the software.
The board's specific features:
  • Additional LEDs, Power, Reset buttons, Clear CMOS switch;
  • Poor overclocking results.


- Discuss the material in a conference

Content:

  • Page 1 - Specifications
  • Page 2 - Layout
  • Page 3 - Expansion options
  • Page 4 - BIOS, system monitoring
  • Page 5 - Overclocking and stability
  • Page 6 - Performance and conclusions




  • Top Stories:
    MoBo:


    ASUS P5E64 WS Evolution and MSI P45D3 Platinum
    ASUS Rampage Formula (Intel X48)
    XFX GTX 280 XXX and MSI HD 4870: not only overclocking
    Jetway HA03 Ultra (AMD 790X)
    ECS GF8200A (NVIDIA GeForce 8200) with integrated graphics
    MSI P45 Platinum and ASUS P5Q Deluxe (Intel P45)
    ECS P45T-A (Intel P45)
    VGA Card:


    Radeon HD4870 CrossFire vs. GeForce GTX 280: quantity vs. quality
    ASUS EAH3850 X2: a metal-framed exclusive
    Radeon HD4870 - a new king in the top-middle class
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 – fast and hot
    Gainward BLISS 9600GSO 768 Mb: does much video memory make much sense?
    Tests of flagship video cards in 1680x1050, 1920x1200, and 2048x1536
    ASUS HD4850 - first tests of the latest GPU AMD RV770
    CPU & Memory:

    CPU Intel Atom 230 (Diamondville)
    Chaintech Apogee GT DDR3 1600
    CPU Intel E7200 (Wolfdale)
    Memory (RAM): spring 2008
    Memory (RAM): early 2008
    AMD Spider: Phenom processors, 7-Series chipsets, etc.
    Intel QX9650 (Penryn): first tests


      Management by AK
      Design VisualPharm.com

    Copyright © 2002-2008 3DNews.Ru All Rights Reserved.
    contact - info@digital-daily.com
    Digital-Daily - English-language version of the popular Russian web-project 3DNews