3DNews Vendor Reference English Resource -
All you need to know about your products!
Biostar And ECS CPU Boundedness Foxconn 9800GTX
About Us | Advertise  
Digital-Daily.com
Digital-Daily

Motherboard
CPU & Memory
Video
Mobile
Cooling
Editorial
Digital
Links

Google
Web
www.digital-daily.com
www.3dnews.ru








Digital-Daily : Motherboard Reviews : asus_msi_x38_x48

ASUS P5E64 WS Professional vs. MSI X48 Platinum

ASUS P5E64 WS Professional vs. MSI X48 Platinum
Author: Aleksandr Mitrofanov
Date: 27.02.2008

Performance tests

When determining the starting FSB speed, it turned out that MSI X48 Platinum overstated it by 1.5 MHz.

In our test setup, we used the following hardware:


Test setup
CPU Intel Core 2 Duo E6550 LGA775 (2.33 GHz; Conroe)
Cooler Gigabyte 3D Cooler GP Edition
Video card ASUS 8800 GT (GeForce 8800 GT; PCI Express x16)
Driver version: 169.25
Sound card -
HDD Samsung HD160JJ
Memory 2x 1024 MB Qimonda DDR3-1333
Power supply unit FSP 550 W
OS MS Vista

Let's first take a look at the results of synthetic benchmarks.

Now on to the gaming benchmarks.

Tests of application software.


Video encoding (DivX, Xvid) was measured in seconds, i.e. the less the better.


Data compression (WinRAR) was measured in MB/sec, i.e. the more, the better.

Final Words

Summing it up, we note the most important point: the functionality and specifications of both the boards are practically similar, and we were unable to choose the best. In particular, the expansion options are identical: each of the boards offer four PCI Express x16 slots, two Gigabit Ethernet controllers, and support the Firewire bus. The only substantial difference is in that the ASUS' board supports ten (!) SerialATA II link, whereas the MSI board - eight links. In terms of overclocking, both the boards demonstrated a stable operation at FSB > 550 MHz, which shows their high quality.

In fact, if we recap all the differences, then the ASUS' board takes a minor lead: the package bundle is a bit better, a bit richer BIOS settings, with the overclocking results 10 MHz higher. On the other hand, the MSI's board is based on the "fresher" X48 chipset, whereas X38 on the ASUS' board. But there is no fundamental difference at real operation between these two boards.

As a result, with equal confidence we can recommend any of these boards for purchase. However, we note one point: ASUS P5E64 WS Professional and MSI X48 Platinum operate only with the rather expensive DDR3 memory whose retail price completely destroys all the advantages of these products. In fact, extra 200-300 dollars for professional users is not a fortune paid for the chance to fit four video cards within a single system.

By the way, prices for DDR3 modules have gone down essentially these days. In particular, 1 GB PC3-8500 (1066 MHz) can already be made available at ~$140, PC3-10667 (1333 MHz) - at ~$190, and PC3-12800 (1600 MHz) - at ~$270. Moreover, first PC3-14380 (1800 MHz) modules have hit the retail. And ASUS P5E64 WS Professional does support them. Needless to say, the prices for DDR3 relative to DDR2 are still very high. In particular, a single 1 GB DDR2-PC6400 module costs about $40. But this trend inspires some optimism regarding the future of DDR3 and increases the urgency of motherboards with support for this type of memory.

ASUS P5E64 WS Professional MSI X48 Platinum

ASUS P5E64 WS Professional vs. MSI X48 Platinum

Conclusion

Pros:
  • high stability and good performance level;
  • four PCI Express x16 slots;
  • support for SerialATA II /RAID ( 10 links; ICH9R + 88SE6145);
  • support for one P-ATA link (Marvell 88SE6145);
  • Integrated 8-channel audio and two LAN (Gigabit Ethernet) controllers;
  • support for USB2.0 (12 ports) and IEEE-1394 (Firewire; 2 ports);
  • passive system for cooling the chipset and the power supply module;
  • wide selection of ASUS' proprietary technologies (PC Probe II, EZ Flash 2, CrashFree BIOS 3, MyLogo2, Q-Fan 2, etc.);
  • additional set of AI Proactive technologies (AI Overclock, OC Profile, AI Net 2, etc.);
  • diagnostic POST-module (+ buttons to power-on and reset).
Cons:
  • Not found.
The board's specific features:
  • excellent results of overclocking the CPU and the memory.
Pros:
  • high stability and good performance level;
  • four PCI Express x16 slots;
  • support for SerialATA II/RAID ( 8 links; ICH9R + Sil 5723);
  • support for one P-ATA line (Marvell 88SE6111);
  • Integrated 8-channel audio and two LAN (Gigabit Ethernet) controllers;
  • support for USB2.0 (12 ports) and IEEE-1394 (Firewire; 2 ports);
  • passive system for cooling the chipset and the power supply module;
  • wide selection of MSI's proprietary utilities (POST diagnostics, D.O.T., BIOS profiles, etc.);
  • integrated POST-diagnostic module;
  • Power-on, Reset, and Clear CMOS buttons;
Cons:
  • Not found.
The board's specific features:
  • excellent results of overclocking the CPU and the memory.
- Discuss the material in the conference


Content:

  • Стр.1 - Specifications, package bundle
  • Стр.2 - Layout and Features; Expansion options
  • Стр.3 - BIOS, monitoring, overclocking tools
  • Стр.4 - Performance and conclusions




  • Top Stories:
    MoBo:


    ECS P45T-A (Intel P45)
    Foxconn A78AX-S and abit AX78 - value motherboards on the AMD 770 chipset
    Foxconn A7GM-S (AMD 780G) + tests of the Hybrid CrossFire
    ASUS Striker II NSE (NVIDIA nForce 790i SLI)
    "Workhorse" motherboards based on 945GC by Gigabyte and Foxconn
    ASUS P5E3 Premium (Intel X48)
    abit I-N73HD and MSI P6NGM (NVIDIA GeForce 71хх)
    VGA Card:


    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 – fast and hot
    Gainward BLISS 9600GSO 768 Mb: does much video memory make much sense?
    Tests of flagship video cards in 1680x1050, 1920x1200, and 2048x1536
    ASUS HD4850 - first tests of the latest GPU AMD RV770
    Forsa 9600 GSO – for thrifty overclockers
    GeForce 9800GTX vs middle-end video cards
    Tests of GeForce 9800GX2 on various platforms
    CPU & Memory:

    Chaintech Apogee GT DDR3 1600
    CPU Intel E7200 (Wolfdale)
    Memory (RAM): spring 2008
    Memory (RAM): early 2008
    AMD Spider: Phenom processors, 7-Series chipsets, etc.
    Intel QX9650 (Penryn): first tests
    Desktop CPUs: 1H' 2007


      Management by AK
      Design VisualPharm.com

    Copyright © 2002-2008 3DNews.Ru All Rights Reserved.
    contact - info@digital-daily.com
    Digital-Daily - English-language version of the popular Russian web-project 3DNews