3DNews Vendor Reference English Resource -
All you need to know about your products!
Biostar And ECS CPU Boundedness Foxconn 9800GTX
About Us | Advertise  
Digital-Daily.com
Digital-Daily

Motherboard
CPU & Memory
Video
Mobile
Cooling
Editorial
Digital
Links

Google
Web
www.digital-daily.com
www.3dnews.ru








Digital-Daily : Motherboard Reviews : ecs_gf8200a_nvidia_geforce_8200

ECS GF8200A (NVIDIA GeForce 8200) with integrated graphics

ECS GF8200A (NVIDIA GeForce 8200) with integrated graphics
Author: Aleksandr Mitrofanov
Date: 03.08.2008

Layout and Features

Apart from them chipsets, the major distinction between the boards is in their form factors. In particular, abit A-N68SV is made in the Micro-ATX format, while the ECS board - in the full-fledged ATX.


abit A-N68SV

ECS GF8200A

Engineers at abit have provided only two 240-pin DIMM slots each for DDR2 memory modules, with the overall supported memory capacity being 4 GB. On the contrary, the ECS board uses for slots for DDR2 and therefore the overall memory capacity may be as much as 8 GB.


abit A-N68SV

ECS GF8200A

As we already said, two slots are quite enough for the average value system, however, four slots allow for a more flexible configuration of memory modules and a more optimum use of cheap 512 MB modules.

Then, both the motherboards offer the integrated GeForce graphic core and allow for using an external video card which is installed into the PCI Express x16 slot.


abit A-N68SV

ECS GF8200A

The configuration of the remaining ports is as follows: the abit board uses two PCI and one PCI Express x1 slots. The large dimensions of the ECS board allowed the engineers to fit three PCI and two PCI Express x1 slots. We also note that to cool the chipset both the motherboards use only an aluminum radiator. Although the dimensions of the radiator on the ECS board are much larger, the ratings for the cooling system are the same because these boards use different chipsets.

The expansion options of the GeForce 8200 chipset are superior to the 7025. In practice, this results in a superiority of the ECS board at the number of SerialATA links. There are six links: five ports are located near the chipset, with one more brought over to the rear panel. On the abit board, all the four ports are positioned near the chipset.


abit A-N68SV

ECS GF8200A

A similar situation is with the number of USB ports. The abit motherboard supports ten USB2.0 ports: four of them are installed on the rear panel, with 6 more ports plugged in with brackets (missing in the package bundle). There are six additional ports on the ECS board (the required brackets are also missing in the package bundle). However, there are six ports on its rear panel (12 altogether), which is more convenient.

Both the motherboards implement the Intel High Definition Audio subsystem. On the other hand, the abit board supports six channels (ALC662 chip is used), while the ECS board - eight (IDT 92HD206XX5 chip).


abit A-N68SV

ECS GF8200A

Now a few words on the network support: the abit board uses the RTL8101B chip made by Realtek (10/100 Mbit), and the ECS - RTL8111B (10/100/1000 Mbit) made by the same company:


abit A-N68SV

ECS GF8200A

The board's rear panel is of the following configuration:


abit A-N68SV

ECS GF8200A

We note that the boards lack both COM ports and the one LPT port. On the abit board, they are missing completely, and the ECS board supports only one COM port implemented with a bracket (missing in the bundle). There are also differences in the number of outputs of the integrated graphic core. The abit board uses VGA and DVI, and on the ECS product - a standard VGA and more up-to-date HDMI. Besides, one SerialATA port is brought over to the rear panel of the ECS port. And lastly: since the abit board uses a much cheaper audio subsystem, there are only three audio outputs on the rear panel versus six on the ECS board.

Here is a traditional diagram of the boards (we found only a diagram for the abit board):


abit A-N68SV

Of the traits of the product, we note the Power and Reset buttons installed on ECS GF8200A.


ECS GF8200A

Now on to the BIOS settings.

Content:

  • Page 1 - Specifications, package bundle
  • Page 2 - Layout and Features; Expansion options
  • Page 3 - BIOS, monitoring, overclocking tools
  • Page 4 - Performance and conclusions




  • Top Stories:
    MoBo:


    MSI P7NGM (NVIDIA GeForce 9300)
    Intel X58 and ASUS P6T Deluxe
    MSI P45 Neo2 (Intel P45)
    Foxconn A7GMX-K (AMD 780G)
    ECS & Gigabyte motherboards (Intel P45 and P43)
    Elitegroup A790GXM-A (AMD 790GX)
    ASUS M3N-H/HDMI (NVIDIA GeForce 8300)
    VGA Card:


    Radeon HD 4830 CrossFire - better than Radeon HD 4870!
    XFX GeForce GTX 260 Black Edition in the SLI mode
    Leadtek WinFast PX9500 GT DDR2 – better than GeForce 9500GT DDR-3
    Palit Radeon HD 4870 Sonic: exclusive, with unusual features
    Palit HD 4850 Sonic: almost Radeon HD 4870, priced as HD 4850
    AMD Radeon HD 4830: faster at the same price
    MSI Radeon HD 4850 vs. Radeon HD4870
    CPU & Memory:

    CPU Intel Core i7-920 (Bloomfield)
    DDR3 memory: late 2008
    CPU AMD Phenom X3 8750 (Toliman)
    AMD Phenom X4 9850 – a top-end CPU at affordable price
    CPU Intel Atom 230 (Diamondville)
    Chaintech Apogee GT DDR3 1600
    CPU Intel E7200 (Wolfdale)


      Management by AK
      Design VisualPharm.com

    Copyright © 2002-2008 3DNews.Ru All Rights Reserved.
    contact - info@digital-daily.com
    Digital-Daily - English-language version of the popular Russian web-project 3DNews