3DNews Vendor Reference English Resource -
All you need to know about your products!
Biostar And ECS CPU Boundedness Foxconn 9800GTX
About Us | Advertise  
Digital-Daily.com
Digital-Daily

Motherboard
CPU & Memory
Video
Mobile
Cooling
Editorial
Digital
Links

Google
Web
www.digital-daily.com
www.3dnews.ru








Digital-Daily : Motherboard Reviews : asus-p4s800d-e

Asus P4S800D-E (SiS 655TX) Motherboard Review

Author: Aleksandr Mitrofanov
Date: 02.06.2004

Performance

I took Abit IC7-MAX3 built on the dual-channel Intel 875P chipset as a contender to our board in question. As regards the P4S800D-E board, we tested it in the two modes: first - in all the default settings, second - the "DRAM Timing" set to "Fast+", and the "Performance Mode" set to "Aggressive". So on the graphs the second mode will be referred to as the "P4S800D-E (tweak)".

In our test configuration, we used the following hardware:


Test configuration
Processor Intel Pentium4 3.2E (Prescott - C)
Video card Asus Radeon 9800XT(445378) (Ati 9800XT chip)
Sound card Creative Live 5.1
HDD IBM DTLA 307030 30Gb
Memory 2x256 MB PC3200 DDR SDRAM TwinX, made by Corsair (latency timings: 2-3-6-3)
Case Inwin506 with PowerMan 300W power supply unit
OS Windows XP SP1

Let's first take a look at the results of synthetic benchmarks.



Now on to the gaming benchmarks.






Asus P4S800D-E has proven a very high performance level of the SiS 655TX chipset. In the nominal mode, the lag behind systems based on Intel chipsets is insignificant. With fine tuning, the user can increase the performance to the level of the i875P chipset.

Anyway, i865PEi875P boards offer potentials for the fine tuning. For example, in Abit IC7-MAX3 the "Game Accelerator" can be engaged, and many i865PEP boards allow switching the PAT.

Final Words

Asus P4S800D-E produced a very good impression: the package bundle deserved a "4.5/5" mark, very wide expansion options and high performance level. All this you get with the comparatively small amount (as per price.ru, the price is approximately $118). On the other hand, some competitors offer motherboards built on the SiS 655TX chipset at 95-98$, with approximately the same package bundle and similar expansion feature-set. On the other hand, none of the presented boards offer a combined 4-channel ParallelATA/SerialATA RAID controller which is quite rare.

In any case, Asus P4S800D-E appears to be an excellent alternative to boards of the mid-end range (on the dual-channel i865P, and even more on the single-channel i848P).


Recommendation

Conclusion

Pros:
  • High stability and performance;
  • Good compatibility to various memory modules.
  • Integrated support for SerialATA (2 channels);
  • Additional 4-channel ParallelATASerialATA RAID controller (2/2 channels, respectively);
  • Integrated 6.1 audio and LAN (Gigabit Ethernet);
  • Support for USB2.0 (8 ports) and IEEE-1394 (2 ports)
  • Rich package bundle (except the header for a COM port);
  • A wide selection Asus' own technologies (Q-Fan; LiveUpdateMyLogo2; PCProbe, CrashFree BIOS 2 etc.).
Cons:
  • Passive cooling of the chipset;
The board's specific features:
  • Powerful overclocking tools, but poor results (a shortcoming of the SiS 655 /FX/TX chipset).

Read more on this topic

Gigabyte 8S655TX Ultra
Stress tests of Pentium4 Northwood

Content:

  • Specifications
  • Layout
  • Expansion options
  • BIOS, monitoring
  • Overclocking and stability
  • Performance and conclusions




  • Top Stories:
    MoBo:


    ASUS P5E64 WS Evolution and MSI P45D3 Platinum
    ASUS Rampage Formula (Intel X48)
    XFX GTX 280 XXX and MSI HD 4870: not only overclocking
    Jetway HA03 Ultra (AMD 790X)
    ECS GF8200A (NVIDIA GeForce 8200) with integrated graphics
    MSI P45 Platinum and ASUS P5Q Deluxe (Intel P45)
    ECS P45T-A (Intel P45)
    VGA Card:


    Radeon HD4870 CrossFire vs. GeForce GTX 280: quantity vs. quality
    ASUS EAH3850 X2: a metal-framed exclusive
    Radeon HD4870 - a new king in the top-middle class
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 – fast and hot
    Gainward BLISS 9600GSO 768 Mb: does much video memory make much sense?
    Tests of flagship video cards in 1680x1050, 1920x1200, and 2048x1536
    ASUS HD4850 - first tests of the latest GPU AMD RV770
    CPU & Memory:

    CPU Intel Atom 230 (Diamondville)
    Chaintech Apogee GT DDR3 1600
    CPU Intel E7200 (Wolfdale)
    Memory (RAM): spring 2008
    Memory (RAM): early 2008
    AMD Spider: Phenom processors, 7-Series chipsets, etc.
    Intel QX9650 (Penryn): first tests


      Management by AK
      Design VisualPharm.com

    Copyright © 2002-2008 3DNews.Ru All Rights Reserved.
    contact - info@digital-daily.com
    Digital-Daily - English-language version of the popular Russian web-project 3DNews